Page 1 of 1

FreeDV

Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2023 10:54 pm
by admin
Ever tire of the whistles crackles and poor audio we take for granted with HF phone?
It doesn't have to be like this if you use freeDV, free Digital Voice. Yes, it really is free, as in beer. There are no restrictions as to what you do with the freely dowloadable code. Make it better, if you can.
Screenshot-2023-06-21-at-9.47.20-PM.png
Details are at https://freedv.org/ with lots of info and a downloadable manual.

It works a bit like other digital modes, in fact the freeDV website claims if you can use WSJT-X, you can do freeDV.
A soundcard or interface is used between the computer USB and the rig, just the same. The only difference is that you need another soundcard, maybe the one already in your computer's sound to join a mic and speakers to the computer.
Hook it up as they show, and enjoy, but remember the PTT is not on the rig's mic, but is now the keyboard spacebar -because you are now talking through the computer, and the computer controls the rig.

It's a lot of fun. Listen around 14.236 USB for a rasping sound digital QSO, which become clear speech with the freeDV software. (The nearby rhythmic sounds on 14.230 are most likely SSTV, rather than freeDV.)

Re: FreeDV

Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2024 11:27 pm
by KX4QC
Now considering other ham radio digital programs, has anyone used the Opensuse Build Service to "build" an RPM for FreeDV? (other than the guy that did it for FreeDV 1.8.9)

There's been many changes since the above version and now the 2.0 Beta is also out.

Have a look! https://freedv.org/

The newest mode "RADAE" is really going to give analog SSB a run for it's money!
--
-----------------------------------
73/Rick
W7IMM (in a few days)
Western Wa
Thanks for the update! RADAE really needs you to check it out. Well, I guess the question is how does it compare with VARA?

Re: FreeDV

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 10:00 am
by KX4QC
Rick.

How does the later FreeDV handle high levels of man-made noise (especially pulse type noise) these days?

The earlier 1.8.x version (I built from source on Mint) was terrible, the slightest QRM would kill decoding for up to half a second, making it worse than analogue SSB under such conditions. Higher levels would prevent the decoder from "locking" to the signal at all.

(With a "clear" signal, it's quality was excellent, but there again, so can analogue SSB under the same clear conditions.)

I have S8+ normal "ambient" noise on 80m here these days, and very little of it is under my control in any way, so I gave up on FreeDV. 🙁

But, if it's more robust now, I may look again.

73.

Dave G0WBX.

--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using open source software:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#53486): https://groups.io/g/linuxham/message/53486
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109364778/1821153
Group Owner: linuxham+owner@groups.io
Well, my 2 cents is that FreeDV continues to improve, but...
DV is often wanted in just such high noise environments, and seems such an obvious approach to improving voice QSOs under such conditions.

Anyone else trying FreeDV?

Re: FreeDV

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 3:20 pm
by KX4QC
Re: [linuxham] FreeDV (was Re: Best Linux for Ham Radio)

Subject: Re: [linuxham] FreeDV (was Re: Best Linux for Ham Radio)
From: "Mooneer Salem via groups.io" <mooneer=gmail.com@groups.io>
Date: 11/3/24, 14:01
To: linuxham@groups.io
Hi Dave,
(Disclaimer: I'm one of the developers on the FreeDV project.)
Some basic information can be found over at https://freedv.org/radio-autoencoder/,
along with some audio samples on the various blog posts on the FreeDV website (for
example: https://freedv.org/davids-freedv-update-september-2024/). I'm not fully sure
about your current setup but it's very probable that RADE will be an improvement over
what you used before, at least with voice quality.
Thanks,
-Mooneer K6AQ
-From the one who knows!

Did you try these samples? -Can't say you didn't like it if you never tried it!

Re: FreeDV

Posted: Sun Nov 03, 2024 6:19 pm
by admin
Subject: Re: [linuxham] FreeDV (was Re: Best Linux for Ham Radio)
From: "Rick, W4XA via groups.io" <myr748=gmail.com@groups.io>
Date: 11/3/24, 18:00
To: linuxham@groups.io
Dave,
I cannot speak to noise handling capability of RADAE (yet) because I have little to no
noise here (yes I know, I am very fortunate)
What little I have played with RADAE, It takes very little signal to noise ratio for it to
produce readable audio.
It is a little "wider' than the other "700" modes. and maybe a little wider than 1600.
Maybe similar to 2020/2020B
I have tried all the other modes from 160-6m and NVIS propagation affects most of the
modes a little differently than sky-wave (F2/E) type propagation.
I found that RADAE works VERY well on 40m using NVIS during late afternoon between
the PNW Seattle/Tacoma area to Eastern Wa (Spokane) etc. Signals that barely moved
the s-meter from zero still produced literally "full-quieting" audio with little to no
garbling.
In AUG 2023 I did a little test with an Oregon station I talk to frequently on 160 & 75m
from here near Tacoma WA.
We were on or around 3750kHz using 700E. I was running 1W with the IC705 and the
other station was running 5W.
It was around 8-9 PM and the summertime lightning/atmospheric noise and static was
running S-9 or better.
We talked using FreeDV at the above power levels for about 30-45min in complete
silence (except for the voice audio)
It would have been nearly impossible and very irritating to hold the same conversation
using SSB with all that noise using the power levels we were running
--
-----------------------------------
73/Rick
Western Wa
This seems more like it! Consistently clean QRP in troublesome noise. I have a feeling that as AM largely gave way to SSB, DV, FreeDV or otherwise DV is the future?